SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.7 número2Razones para el uso de mascarillas en lugares abiertos luego del anuncio de no obligatoriedad por el gobierno peruano en el contexto de la COVID-19 en 2022Factores asociados a dolor lumbar en trabajadores sanitarios de un hospital de referencia del Perú índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

  • No hay articulos citadosCitado por SciELO

Links relacionados

  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Medicina clínica y social

versión On-line ISSN 2521-2281

Resumen

SAN MIGUEL, Anahí Vera; NUNEZ LEZCANO, Fernando  y  SANABRIA-BAEZ, Gabriela. Attitudes towards academic plagiarism in medicine students from private and public universities. Med. clín. soc. [online]. 2023, vol.7, n.2, pp.70-76. ISSN 2521-2281.  https://doi.org/10.52379/mcs.v7i2.287.

Introduction:

the development of the knowledge society, the information society and the rise of information and communication technologies (ICT) facilitate the multi-literacy of a student; however, they also facilitate and exploit academic and intellectual fraud.

Objective:

to know the student perception about plagiarism in research papers.

Methods:

descriptive, observational, cross-sectional study on the perception of plagiarism in students of public and private faculties of health sciences in Asunción.

Results:

of 139 students, 68 (49%) corresponded to public faculties. Between 51% and 69% carried out research work at least once in their university career, the mean age of the sample was 21 ± 3 years (range: 17-40 years). As for extracting information from the internet without referring to the author: there is a significant difference (p= 0.006) between public and private faculties: public: 38.2% sometimes do it, and 61.8% never do it. And the private ones: 56.3% sometimes do it, 38% never and 5.6% always do it. Most of the students refer that academic plagiarism is always carried out in the schools. The students state that measures must be implemented to avoid academic plagiarism in these percentages: between 64.6% and 73.5% must always be reported; cancel the research between 52.1% and 75%. Both measures present a significant difference between the public and private faculties (p<0.05).

Discussion:

in general, the perception of plagiarism among medical students is present, and they identify the concept of plagiarism. The causes are multifactorial from both the student and the teacher. There must be a penalty for authors who plagiarize, accompanied by awareness workshops at the initial levels of education, to avoid this practice.

Palabras clave : academic plagiarism; university students; student ethics.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )