<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>2521-2281</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Medicina clínica y social]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Med. clín. soc.]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>2521-2281</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Facultad de Ciencias Médicas, Filial de Santa Rosa del Aguaray, Cátedra de Socioantropología]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S2521-22812021000300135</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.52379/mcs.v5i3.222</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Correlación entre las estrategias SITA Estándar 24 -2 y SITA Faster 24 -2 para evaluar el daño campimétrico en pacientes con Glaucoma Primario de Ángulo Abierto]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Correlation between the SITA Standard 24-2 and SITA Faster 24-2 strategies to assess campimetric damage in patients with Primary Open Angle Glaucoma.]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pavía]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Justo Manuel]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vera-Duarte]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Guillermo Raúl]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Arrúa-Caballero]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Martín Fernando]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad Nacional de Asunción Facultad de Ciencias Médicas ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[San Lorenzo ]]></addr-line>
<country>Paraguay</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2021</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2021</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>5</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<fpage>135</fpage>
<lpage>140</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.iics.una.py/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S2521-22812021000300135&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.iics.una.py/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S2521-22812021000300135&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.iics.una.py/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S2521-22812021000300135&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[RESUMEN  Introducción:  Las estrategias de SITA Estándar fueron aprovechadas por más de dos décadas, pero buscando aun mejorar el tiempo sin perder la calidad, se volvió a crear una nueva estrategia más corta, a la cual llamaron estrategia FASTER.  Objetivo:  Determinar la correlación entre las estrategias SITA Estándar 24 -2 y SITA Faster 24 -2 para evaluar el daño campimétrico en pacientes con Glaucoma Primario de Angulo Abierto.  Metodología:  Estudio observacional analítico. RESULTADOS: Se analizó 74 resultados de análisis del campo visual utilizando dos técnicas SITA Estándar 24 - 2 y SITA Faster 24 - 2. El tiempo de prueba para la estrategia SITA Estándar fue de 379,64 ± 72,75 segundos y para la estrategia SITA Faster 170,93 ± 49,17 (p&lt;0,0001), probando una reducción de tiempo del 55% para la segunda. Los valores de desviación media, desviación patrón estándar y el índice de campo visual no mostraron diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre ambas pruebas. La Prueba de Hemicampo de glaucoma con el cálculo del índice Kappa de Cohen arroja un valor de 0,316 con un intervalo de confianza del 95 % de (0,098 - 0,534) lo que indica que es estadísticamente significativo.  Discusión:  Los resultados generales indican que es posible reemplazar la estrategia SITA Estándar 24 -2 con la estrategia SITA Faster 24 - 2. Este cambio será especialmente útil para aumentar la frecuencia de exámenes campimétricos, determinante para una detección más temprana de la progresión del glaucoma y así mejorar las conductas terapéuticas que se toman con los pacientes que acuden a nuestro servicio.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[ABSTRACT  Introduction:  SITA Standard strategies were used for more than two decades, but still seeking to improve time without losing quality, a new shorter strategy was created again, which they called the FASTER strategy. Objective: To determine the correlation between the SITA Standard 24-2 and SITA Faster 24-2 strategies to evaluate the visual field damage in patients with Primary Open Angle Glaucoma.  Methodology:  Analytical observational study.  Results:  74 visual field analysis results were analyzed using two techniques SITA Standard 24 - 2 and SITA Faster 24 - 2. The test time for the SITA Standard strategy was 379.64 ± 72.75 seconds and for the SITA strategy Faster 170.93 ± 49.17 (p &lt;0.0001), proving a 55% time reduction for the second. The mean deviation, standard deviation and visual field index values do not show statistically significant differences between both tests. The Glaucoma Hemifield Test with the calculation of the Cohen's Kappa index gives a value of 0.316 with a 95% confidence interval of (0.098 - 0.534) which indicates that it is statistically significant.  Discussion:  The overall results indicate that it is possible to replace the SITA Standard 24-2 strategy with the SITA Faster 24-2 strategy. This change will be especially useful to increase the frequency of campimetric examinations. A greater frequency of examinations is important for earlier detection of glaucoma progression and thus improve the therapeutic behaviors that are taken with the patients who come to our service.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Campimetría]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[SITA Estándar]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[SITA Faster]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[correlación]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Glaucoma Primario de Ángulo Abierto]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Campimetry]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[SITA Standard]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[SITA Faster]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[correlation]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Primary Open Angle Glaucoma]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<label>1</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Skuta]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cantor]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ophthalmology]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[American Academy of]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Glaucoma]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Basic and Clinical Science Course. 2017-2018]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<volume>10</volume>
<page-range>61-84</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[American Academy of Ophthalmology]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<label>2</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Prum]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rosenberg]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Panel]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[American Academy of Ophthalmology Glaucoma]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Preferred Practice Pattern Guidelines. Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[San Francisco ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[American Academy of Ophthalmology]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<label>3</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Silva]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Najafi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Suwan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Y]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Teekhasaenee]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ritch]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The iridocorneal endothelial syndrome]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Survey of Ophthalmology]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<volume>63</volume>
<numero>5</numero>
<issue>5</issue>
<page-range>665-76</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<label>4</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bengtsson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Heijl]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Olsson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Evaluation of a new threshold visual field strategy, SITA, in normal subjects: Evaluation of a new threshold visual field strategy, SITA, in normal subjects]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica]]></source>
<year>1998</year>
<volume>76</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>165-9</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<label>5</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Johnson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[CA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Adams]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[CW]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lewis]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[RA]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Fatigue effects in automated perimetry]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Appl Opt]]></source>
<year>1988</year>
<volume>27</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
<page-range>1030</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<label>6</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jampel]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[HD]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Singh]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SC]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Chen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[TC]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Francis]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[BA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hodapp]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Assessment of Visual Function in Glaucoma]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ophthalmology]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>118</volume>
<numero>5</numero>
<issue>5</issue>
<page-range>986-1002</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<label>7</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bengtsson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Heijl]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[SITA Fast, a new rapid perimetric threshold test. Description of methods and evaluation in patients with manifest and suspect glaucoma: SITA Fast, a new rapid perimetric threshold test. Description of methods and evaluation in patients with manifest and suspect glaucoma]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica]]></source>
<year>1998</year>
<volume>76</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>431-7</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<label>8</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Malik]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Baker]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Russell]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[RA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Crabb]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[DP]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[A survey of attitudes of glaucoma subspecialists in England and Wales to visual field test intervals in relation to NICE guidelines]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[BMJ Open]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>3</volume>
<numero>5</numero>
<issue>5</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<label>9</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Artes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[PH]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Iwase]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ohno]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Y]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kitazawa]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Y]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Chauhan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[BC]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Properties of perimetric threshold estimates from Full Threshold, SITA Standard, and SITA Fast strategies]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<volume>43</volume>
<numero>8</numero>
<issue>8</issue>
<page-range>2654-9</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<label>10</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Centeno]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[ED de]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hidalgo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Quiroz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Juárez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Calibración de dos observadores para evaluar para evaluar restauraciones en una investigación clínica. Aplicación del Índice de Concordancia de KAPPA]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revista de la Facultad de Odontología]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>4</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>7-11</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<label>11</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Phu]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Khuu]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SK]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Agar]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kalloniatis]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Clinical Evaluation of Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm-Faster Compared With Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm-Standard in Normal Subjects, Glaucoma Suspects, and Patients With Glaucoma]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[American Journal of Ophthalmology]]></source>
<year>2019</year>
<volume>208</volume>
<page-range>251-64</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
