<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>1816-8949</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Anales de la Facultad de Ciencias Médicas (Asunción)]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[An. Fac. Cienc. Méd. (Asunción)]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>1816-8949</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[EFACIM. Editorial de la Facultad de Ciencias Médicas - Universidad Nacional de Asunción]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S1816-89492025000200101</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18004/anales/2025.058.02.101</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[La pluma digital frente al desafío editorial: ¿Una alianza transformadora o una amenaza a la integridad científica?]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The Digital Pen and the Editorial Challenge: A Transformative Alliance or a Threat to Scientific Integrity?]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sánchez Zaracho]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Bartolomé]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jiménez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Hassel Jimmy]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad Nacional de Asunción Facultad de Ciencias Médicas Dirección de EFACIM, Revista Anales de la Facultad de Ciencias Médicas]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[San Lorenzo ]]></addr-line>
<country>Paraguay</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>08</month>
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>08</month>
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>58</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<fpage>101</fpage>
<lpage>104</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.iics.una.py/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S1816-89492025000200101&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.iics.una.py/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S1816-89492025000200101&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.iics.una.py/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S1816-89492025000200101&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[RESUMEN La incorporación de herramientas de inteligencia artificial (IA) en los procesos de escritura y publicación científica representa un cambio paradigmático que está transformando la forma en que los investigadores generan y comunican conocimiento. Este artículo analiza el impacto de la IA generativa en la investigación y la labor editorial, explorando tanto sus beneficios como sus desafíos éticos. Entre los beneficios destacan la agilización de búsquedas bibliográficas, la optimización de la redacción multilenguaje y la liberación de tiempo para que los investigadores y editores se concentren en el juicio crítico y la creatividad. No obstante, surgen riesgos significativos, como el AIgiarism y la amplificación de sesgos, que requieren vigilancia y supervisión humana constante. Se enfatiza la necesidad de políticas claras, formación ética y metodológica, y un uso consciente de la IA que ayude, en lugar de reemplazar, la voz científica humana. Este trabajo concluye que, cuando se integra responsablemente, la &#8220;pluma digital&#8221; puede ser una aliada poderosa, acelerando la ciencia sin comprometer la integridad ni la pasión que caracterizan a la investigación.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[ABSTRACT The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) tools in scientific writing and publishing represents a paradigmatic shift that is reshaping how researchers generate and communicate knowledge. This article examines the impact of generative AI on research and editorial processes, highlighting both its potential benefits and ethical challenges. Key advantages include streamlined literature searches, enhanced multilingual writing, and the freeing of time for researchers and editors to focus on critical judgment and creative thinking. However, significant risks also arise, such as AIgiarism and bias amplification, which demand vigilant human oversight. The article underscores the need for clear policies, ethical and methodological training, and a conscious approach to AI use that enhances, rather than replaces, the human scientific voice. It concludes that, when responsibly integrated, the &#8220;digital pen&#8221; can be a powerful ally-accelerating science while preserving the integrity and passion that define genuine research.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Inteligencia artificial]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Publicación científica]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Ética profesional]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Bibliometría]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Redacción científica]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Scientific Publishing]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Professional Ethics]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Bibliometrics]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Scientific Writing]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<label>1</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Khalifa]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Albadawy]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Using artificial intelligence in academic writing and research: An essential productivity tool]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine Update]]></source>
<year>2024</year>
<volume>5</volume>
<page-range>100145</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<label>2</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Farhat]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Silva]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[ES]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hassani]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Madsen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[DØ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sohail]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SS]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Himeur]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Y]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The scholarly footprint of ChatGPT: a bibliometric analysis of the early outbreak phase]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Front Artif Intell]]></source>
<year>2024</year>
<volume>6</volume>
<page-range>1270749</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<label>3</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kim]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SJ]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Trends in research on ChatGPT and adoption-related issues discussed in articles: a narrative review.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Sci Ed]]></source>
<year>2024</year>
<volume>11</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>3-11</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<label>4</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ioannidis]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JPA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Maniadis]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Z]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[In defense of quantitative metrics in researcher assessments]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[PLoS Biol]]></source>
<year>2023</year>
<volume>21</volume>
<numero>12</numero>
<issue>12</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<label>5</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tang]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[BL.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The underappreciated wrong of AIgiarism: bypass plagiarism that risks propagation of erroneous and biased content]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[EXCLI J.]]></source>
<year>2023</year>
<volume>22</volume>
<page-range>907-10</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<label>6</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kar]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SK]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bansal]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Modi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Singh]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[How Sensitive Are the Free AI-detector Tools in Detecting AI-generated Texts? A Comparison of Popular AI-detector Tools.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Indian J Psychol Med]]></source>
<year>2025</year>
<volume>47</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>275-8</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<label>7</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Stokel-Walker]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Nature]]></source>
<year>2023</year>
<volume>613</volume>
<numero>7945</numero>
<issue>7945</issue>
<page-range>620-1</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<label>8</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Barrios]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Inteligencia artificial y redacción científica: aspectos éticos en el uso de las nuevas tecnologías]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Med Clin Soc]]></source>
<year>2023</year>
<volume>7</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>46-7</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<label>9</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<collab>Elsevier</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Use of AI-assisted language models in scientific writing: guidance for authors]]></source>
<year>2023</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Elsevier]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<label>10</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Li]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[ZQ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Xu]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[HL]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cao]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[HJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Liu]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[ZL]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fei]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[YT]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Liu]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JP]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Use of Artificial Intelligence in Peer Review Among Top 100 Medical Journals]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[JAMA Netw Open]]></source>
<year>2024</year>
<volume>7</volume>
<numero>12</numero>
<issue>12</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<label>11</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hosseini]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Horbach]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SPJM]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Fighting reviewer fatigue or amplifying bias? Considerations and recommendations for use of ChatGPT and other large language models in scholarly peer review.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Res Integr Peer Rev]]></source>
<year>2023</year>
<volume>8</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>4</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
