<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>2521-2281</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Medicina clínica y social]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Med. clín. soc.]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>2521-2281</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Facultad de Ciencias Médicas, Filial de Santa Rosa del Aguaray, Cátedra de Socioantropología]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S2521-22812023000200070</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.52379/mcs.v7i2.287</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Actitudes frente al plagio académico en estudiantes de medicina de universidades privadas y públicas]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Attitudes towards academic plagiarism in medicine students from private and public universities]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[San Miguel]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Anahí Vera]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Núñez Lezcano]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Fernando]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sanabria-Báez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Gabriela]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Instituto de Previsión Social  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Asunción ]]></addr-line>
<country>Paraguay</country>
</aff>
<aff id="Af2">
<institution><![CDATA[,Ministerio de Salud Pública y Bienestar Social Programa Nacional de Control de la Leismaniasis ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Asunción ]]></addr-line>
<country>Paraguay</country>
</aff>
<aff id="Af3">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad Nacional de Asunción Facultad de Ciencias Médicas Filial Santa Rosa del Aguaray ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Santa Rosa del Aguaray ]]></addr-line>
<country>Paraguay</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>08</month>
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>08</month>
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>7</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<fpage>70</fpage>
<lpage>76</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.iics.una.py/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S2521-22812023000200070&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.iics.una.py/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S2521-22812023000200070&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.iics.una.py/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S2521-22812023000200070&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[RESUMEN  Introducción:  el desarrollo de la sociedad del conocimiento, la sociedad de la información y el auge de las tecnologías de la información y la comunicación (TIC) facilitan la multi-alfabetización de un estudiante; sin embargo, también facilitan y explotan el fraude académico e intelectual.  Objetivo:  conocer la percepción estudiantil acerca del plagio en los trabajos de investigación.  Metodología:  estudio descriptivo observacional, de corte transversal sobre la precepción del plagio en estudiantes de facultades publicas y privadas de ciencias de la salud de Asunción.  Resultados:  de 139 estudiantes, 68 (49%) correspondieron a facultades publicas. Entre el 51 % al 69 % realizaron trabajos de investigación al menos una vez en su carrera universitaria, la edad media de la muestra fue 21 ± 3 años (rango: 17-40 años). En cuanto al extraer de internet información sin referir el autor: existe una diferencia significativa (p= 0,006), entre facultades publicas y privadas: publicas: 38,2 % algunas veces lo realiza, y 61,8 % nunca lo realiza. Y las privadas: 56,3 % algunas veces lo realiza, 38 % nunca y 5,6 % siempre lo realiza. La mayoría de los estudiantes refieren que el plagio académico siempre se realiza en las escuelas. Los estudiantes manifiestan que se deben implementar medidas para evitar el plagio académico en estos porcentajes: siempre se debe informar entre el 64,6 % y 73,5 %; anular el trabajo de investigación entre el 52,1 % y 75 %. Ambas medidas presentan una diferencia significativa entre las facultades publicas y privadas (p&lt;0,05).  Discusión:  en general, la percepción de plagio entre los estudiantes de medicina está presente, e identifican el concepto de plagio. Las causas son multifactoriales tanto desde el alumno como del docente. Debe existir penalización para los autores que realizan plagio, acompañado de talleres de concienciación en los niveles iniciales de educación, para evitar esta práctica.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[ABSTRACT  Introduction:  the development of the knowledge society, the information society and the rise of information and communication technologies (ICT) facilitate the multi-literacy of a student; however, they also facilitate and exploit academic and intellectual fraud.  Objective:  to know the student perception about plagiarism in research papers.  Methods:  descriptive, observational, cross-sectional study on the perception of plagiarism in students of public and private faculties of health sciences in Asunción.  Results:  of 139 students, 68 (49%) corresponded to public faculties. Between 51% and 69% carried out research work at least once in their university career, the mean age of the sample was 21 ± 3 years (range: 17-40 years). As for extracting information from the internet without referring to the author: there is a significant difference (p= 0.006) between public and private faculties: public: 38.2% sometimes do it, and 61.8% never do it. And the private ones: 56.3% sometimes do it, 38% never and 5.6% always do it. Most of the students refer that academic plagiarism is always carried out in the schools. The students state that measures must be implemented to avoid academic plagiarism in these percentages: between 64.6% and 73.5% must always be reported; cancel the research between 52.1% and 75%. Both measures present a significant difference between the public and private faculties (p&lt;0.05).  Discussion:  in general, the perception of plagiarism among medical students is present, and they identify the concept of plagiarism. The causes are multifactorial from both the student and the teacher. There must be a penalty for authors who plagiarize, accompanied by awareness workshops at the initial levels of education, to avoid this practice.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[plagio académico]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[universitarios]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[ética estudiantil]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[academic plagiarism]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[university students]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[student ethics]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<label>1</label><nlm-citation citation-type="">
<source><![CDATA[Oxford Dictionaries. Internet. Oxford University Press]]></source>
<year>2023</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<label>2</label><nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<collab>Scott-Lichter D and the Editorial Policy Committee, Council of Science Editors</collab>
<source><![CDATA[CSE's White Paper on Promoting Integrity in Scientific Journal Publications]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<edition>3</edition>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[CO ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Wheat Ridge]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<label>3</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Yates]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[&#8220;Concerns&#8221; about medical students&#8217; adverse behaviour and attitude: An audit of practice at Nottingham, with mapping to GMC guidance]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[BMC Med Educ]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>14</volume>
<page-range>196</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<label>4</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mason]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[PR]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Plagiarism in scientific publications]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Infect Dev Ctries]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<volume>3</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>1-4</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<label>5</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cole]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AF]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Plagiarism in graduate medical education]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Fam Med]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<volume>39</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
<page-range>436-8</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<label>6</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Andreescu]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Self-plagiarism in academic publishing: the anatomy of a misnomer]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Sci Eng Ethics]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>19</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>775-97</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<label>7</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Blanch-Mur]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rey-Abella]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Folch-Soler]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Nivel de conducta académica deshonesta entre los estudiantes de una escuela de ciencias de la salud]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Enfermería Clínica]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<volume>16</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>57-61</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<label>8</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sharma]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[BK]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Plagiarism among university students: Intentional or accidental?]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of NELTA]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<volume>12</volume>
<numero>1&amp;2</numero>
<issue>1&amp;2</issue>
<page-range>134-41</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<label>9</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Szabo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Underwood]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Cybercheats: Is Information and Communication Technology Fuelling Academic Dishonesty?]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Active Learning in Higher Education]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<volume>5</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>180-99</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<label>10</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rennie]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SC]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Crosby]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JR]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Are "tomorrow's doctors" honest? Questionnaire study exploring medical students' attitudes and reported behaviour on academic misconduct]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[BMJ]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<volume>322</volume>
<numero>7281</numero>
<issue>7281</issue>
<page-range>274-5</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<label>11</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ocampo Rojas]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Urizar]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[CA]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Desconocimiento sobre plagio en estudiantes de ciencias de la salud]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Discover Medicine]]></source>
<year>2023</year>
<volume>2</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>9-10</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<label>12</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ordoñez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mejía]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[El fraude académico en la Universidad de los Andes ¿qué tanto y por qué?]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revista de estudios sociales]]></source>
<year>2004</year>
<volume>18</volume>
<page-range>13-25</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
