<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>2304-7887</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Revista de la Secretaría del Tribunal Permanente de Revisión]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Rev. secr. Trib. perm. revis.]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>2304-7887</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Secretaría del Tribunal Permanente de Revisión]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S2304-78872025002200109</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.16890/rstpr.a13.n22.e567</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Jurisdicción y Soberanía Democrática: La experiencia brasileña en la regulación de las grandes empresas tecnológicas de la economía digital]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Jurisdição e Soberania Democrática: A experiência brasileira na regulação das grandes empresas tecnológicas da economia digital]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Jurisdiction and Democratic Sovereignty: The brazilian experience in regulating big techs in the digital economy]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="fr"><![CDATA[Juridiction et Souveraineté Democratique: L&#8217;expérience brésilienne dans la régulation des grandes entreprises technologiques de l&#8217;économie numérique]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ramos]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[André de Carvalho]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Abade]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Denise Neves]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad de San Paulo  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[San Paulo ]]></addr-line>
<country>Brazil</country>
</aff>
<aff id="Af2">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad Presbiteriana Mackenzie Facultad de Derecho ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[San Paulo ]]></addr-line>
<country>Brazil</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>13</volume>
<numero>22</numero>
<fpage>109</fpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.iics.una.py/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S2304-78872025002200109&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.iics.una.py/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S2304-78872025002200109&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.iics.una.py/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S2304-78872025002200109&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Resumen: Este artículo examina la decisión del Supremo Tribunal Federal de Brasil en la Acción Declaratoria de Constitucionalidad nº 51 y su impacto en la regulación de la actuación empresarial de las grandes plataformas digitales, al imponer límites a su libertad de actuar económica. La sentencia reconoció que los tribunales brasileños pueden ordenar directamente a las plataformas la entrega de datos vinculados al país, aun cuando estén almacenados en el extranjero, rechazando la tesis de la inmunidad económica y tecnológica de las big techs y considerando la cooperación internacional como una vía posible, aunque no exclusiva. Se concluye que la experiencia brasileña contribuye al fortalecimiento de la soberanía democrática en la Era Digital, garantiza el acceso a la justicia, impide el total arbitrio empresarial en la conducción de la actividad económica de las plataformas y ofrece un parámetro relevante para la construcción de un constitucionalismo digital de alcance global.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="pt"><p><![CDATA[Resumo. Este artigo examina a decisão do Supremo Tribunal Federal do Brasil na Ação Declaratória de Constitucionalidade nº &#1637;&#1633; e seu impacto sobre a regulação da atuação empresarial das grandes plataformas digitais, ao impor limites à sua liberdade de agir econômica. A sentença reconheceu que os tribunais brasileiros podem determinar diretamente às plataformas a entrega de dados vinculados ao país, ainda que armazenados no exterior, afastando a tese da imunidade econômica e tecnológica das big techs e tratando a cooperação internacional como alternativa possível, mas não exclusiva. Conclui-se que a experiência brasileira contribui para o fortalecimento da soberania democrática na Era Digital, assegura o acesso à justiça, impede o total arbítrio empresarial na condução da atividade econômica das plataformas e oferece um parâmetro relevante para a construção de um constitucionalismo digital de alcance global.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Abstract. This article examines the decision of the Brazilian Supreme Federal Court in Declaratory Action of Constitutionality No. 51 and its impact on the regulation of the business conduct of major digital platforms, by imposing limits on their economic freedom of action. The judgment recognised that Brazilian courts may directly order platforms to provide data connected to the country, even when stored abroad, rejecting the thesis of the economic and technological immunity of big techs and considering international cooperation as an alternative path, though not the exclusive one. It is concluded that the Brazilian experience contributes to strengthening democratic sovereignty in the Digital Era, ensures access to justice, prevents the total business arbitrariness in the conduct of the platforms&#8217; economic activity, and provides a relevant parameter for the construction of a global digital constitutionalism.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="fr"><p><![CDATA[Résumé.Cet article analyse la décision du Tribunal Suprême Fédéral du Brésil dans l&#8217;Action Déclaratoire de Constitutionnalité n° &#1637;&#1633; et son impact sur la régulation de l&#8217;activité des grandes plateformes numériques, en imposant des limites à leur liberté d&#8217;action économique. L&#8217;arrêt a reconnu que les tribunaux brésiliens peuvent ordonner directement aux plateformes de fournir des données liées au pays, même lorsqu&#8217;elles sont stockées à l&#8217;étranger, en rejetant la thèse de l&#8217;immunité économique et technologique des big techs et en considérant la coopération internationale comme une voie possible, mais non exclusive. Il en ressort que l&#8217;expérience brésilienne contribue au renforcement de la souveraineté democratique à l&#8217;Ère numérique, garantit l&#8217;accès à la justice, empêche l&#8217;arbitraire entrepreneurial total dans la conduite de l&#8217;activité économique des plateformes et constitue un paramètre pertinent pour la construction d&#8217;un constitutionnalisme numérique de portée mondiale.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Derecho internacional económico y nuevas tecnologías]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Jurisdicción internacional]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Era digital]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Poder económico]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Soberanía]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Acceso a la justicia]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Direito internacional económico e novas tecnologias]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Jurisdição internacional]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Era digital]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Poder econômico]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Soberania]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Acesso à justiça]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[International economic law and new technologies]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[International jurisdiction]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Digital era]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Economic power]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Sovereignty]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Access to justice]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="fr"><![CDATA[Droit international économique et nouvelles technologies]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="fr"><![CDATA[Juridiction internationale]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="fr"><![CDATA[Ère numérique]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="fr"><![CDATA[Pouvoir économique]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="fr"><![CDATA[Souveraineté]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="fr"><![CDATA[Accès à la justice]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ABADE]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Denise Neves]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Direitos Fundamentais na Cooperação Jurídica Internacional]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[São Paulo ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Saraiva]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ABREU]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Jacqueline de Souza]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Jurisdictional battles for digital evidence, MLAT reform, and the Brazilian experience. Conflitos de jurisdição por provas digitais, reforma da cooperação judiciária internacional, e a experiência brasileira]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revista de Informação Legislativa]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<volume>55</volume>
<numero>220</numero>
<issue>220</issue>
<page-range>233-57</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Brasília ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BALTAR]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Leandro]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[El control de competencia internacional desde el derecho internacional privado argentino]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revista de la Secretaría del Tribunal Permanente de Revisión]]></source>
<year>2019</year>
<volume>7</volume>
<numero>14</numero>
<issue>14</issue>
<page-range>222-4</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BERMAN]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Paul Schiff]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Jurisdictional Pluralism]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ALLEN]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Stephen]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[COSTELOOE]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Daniel]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[FITZMAURICE]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Malgosia]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[GRAGL]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Paul]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[GUNTRIP]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Edward]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The Oxford handbook of jurisdiction in international law.]]></source>
<year>2019</year>
<page-range>121-60</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Oxford ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Oxford University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<collab>BRASIL. SUPREMO TRIBUNAL FEDERAL (Pleno)</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Acción Declaratoria de Constitucionalidad n.º 51, sentencia de 23 de febrero de 2023]]></source>
<year></year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[CARVALHO RAMOS]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[André]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Curso de Direito Internacional Privado]]></source>
<year>2025</year>
<edition>4ª ed.,</edition>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[São Paulo ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Saraivajur]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[CORTE INTERAMERICANA DE DERECHOS]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[HUMANOS]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Velásquez Rodríguez vs. Honduras. Sentencia de 29 de julio de 1988 (Fondo)]]></source>
<year>1988</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<collab>CORTE INTERAMERICANA DE DERECHOS HUMANOS</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Favela Nova Brasília vs. Brasil. Sentencia de 16 de febrero de 2017 (Excepciones preliminares, Fondo, Reparaciones y Costas)]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<collab>CORTE INTERAMERICANA DE DERECHOS HUMANOS</collab>
<source><![CDATA[González y otras ("Campo Algodonero") vs. México. Sentencia de 16 de noviembre de 2009 (Excepción preliminar, Fondo, Reparaciones y Costas)]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[HAWKINS]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Eric C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[General jurisdiction and internet contacts: what role, if any, should the zippo sliding scale test play in the analysis]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Fordham Law Review]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<volume>74</volume>
<page-range>2371-423</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[LOWE]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Vaughan]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Jurisdiction]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[EVANS]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Malcolm D]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[International law]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<page-range>329-55</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[New York ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Oxford University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MENDES]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Gilmar Ferreira]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[FERNANDES]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Victor Oliveira]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Constitucionalismo digital e jurisdição constitucional: uma agenda de pesquisa para o caso brasileiro]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revista Brasileira de Direito]]></source>
<year>2020</year>
<volume>16</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>1-33</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Passo Fundo ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[RYNGAERT]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Cedric]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Jurisdiction in International Law]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<edition>2ª ed</edition>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Oxford ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Oxford University Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[TIBURCIO]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Carmen]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ALBUQUERQUE]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Felipe]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Territorialidade, jurisdição e Internet: alguns aspectos de direito internacional privado]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual]]></source>
<year>2023</year>
<volume>24</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>34-57</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Rio de Janeiro ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<collab>TRIBUNAL EUROPEO DE DERECHOS HUMANOS</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Golder vs. Reino Unido]]></source>
<year>1975</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<collab>TRIBUNAL EUROPEO DE DERECHOS HUMANOS</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Sunday Times vs. Reino Unido]]></source>
<year>1979</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
