SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.11 número1Frecuencia de microorganismos bacterianos aislados de pacientes caninos con diarrea que acuden al Hospital Veterinario "Prof. Dr. José Vicente Núñez" de la Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias - Universidad Nacional de Asunción en el año 2018Parásitos gastrointestinales hallados en Psitácidos de los géneros Amazona sp., Ara sp. Aratinga sp. Forpus sp. e Híbridos de Guacamayos de la Estación Biológica La Esmeralda, Santa Fe, Argentina índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

  • No hay articulos citadosCitado por SciELO

Links relacionados

  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Compendio de Ciencias Veterinarias

versión On-line ISSN 2226-1761

Resumen

GALLARD, EA; MENICHELLI, MM; DI MASSO, RJ  y  REVIDATTI, FA. Effect of stocking density and house section on body weight of broilers. Compend. cienc. vet [online]. 2021, vol.11, n.1, pp.13-19. ISSN 2226-1761.  https://doi.org/10.18004/compend.cienc.vet.2021.11.01.13.

Stocking density represents a central factor on poultry profitability. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of stocking density and house section on the productive performance of male and female broilers. Cobb500(r) chickens were housed in two darkened houses under two densities: standard (14 chickens/m2) and reduced (12 chickens/m2). Three zones were defined: Extractors, Intermediate and Panels. No effect of density per zone interaction was observed on final weight in males (p= 0.574) and females (p= 0.338). Regardless of the zone, both males and females were heavier (Males: 3,265 vs. 3,006 g; Females: 2,653 vs. 2535 g; p <0.0001) under reduced density. Males from the Panels zone were heavier at the end of the cycle, while the females were not different (Males: Extractors: 3,086 g; Intermediate: 3,103 g; Panels: 3,218 g; p <0.0001. Females: Extractors: 2,563 g; Intermediate: 2,552 g; Panels: 2,652.5 g; p> 0,05). The decrease in stocking density improved final weight. House section affected the final weight of the male chickens. Despite the lower individual performance, the higher density allowed to obtain a higher production in kg of chicken meat per m2.

Palabras clave : broilers; growth; environment; intensive systems; temperature..

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )